Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%
Print this page

Who'd be a bloody teacher?

by
October 1983, no. 55

Teacher Learning edited by Gwyneth Dow

Routledge & Kegan Paul, 185 pp, $11.50 pb

Book 2 Cover Small (400 x 600)

Melbourne Studies in Education 1982 edited by Stephen Murray-Smith

Melbourne University Press, 289 pp, $19.00 pb

Who'd be a bloody teacher?

by
October 1983, no. 55

Gwyneth Dow has edited a collection of essays that forms a relevant and coherent whole. The authors seek to salvage what they see as ‘the good things’ in education reform of the late sixties and early seventies, reform that had weaknesses which were the result of ‘faulty thinking, poor social analysis, romantic psychological theories, slip-shod pedagogy’. The contributors to this book are Rory Barnes, Gwyneth Dow, Rod Foster, Noel P. Gough, Bill Hannan, and Doug White. Gwyneth Dow points out they do not all share the same ideological positions, but they are clearly in fundamental agreement about curriculum reform, a more democratic approach to teaching and to the running of schools, and a more socially aware view of teaching and teacher education.

This book is at once theoretical and practical. It takes quite a daring approach by creating Maria, a young schoolteacher. The contributors follow her as she and her colleagues attempt to devise a more meaningful curriculum. In presenting Maria, the writers use the techniques of both the biographer and the novelist. ‘Maria wandered out to Paul's kitchen to make coffee. She leant against the sink. Jesus, who'd be a bloody teacher?’ Extraordinarily, among other things this book is ‘a good read’. Maria is interesting in herself, and not a lifeless ‘John and Mary’ figure. The device is handled with skill and restraint, and some of Mary's colleagues are used as convincing devil's advocates against co-operative reform in teaching and teacher education.

You May Also Like