Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%
Print this page

Silence breakers

A feminist critique of defamation law
by
July 2024, no. 466

Suing for Silence: Sexual violence and defamation law by Mandi Gray

University of British Columbia Press, Can$32.95 pb, 174 pp

Silence breakers

A feminist critique of defamation law
by
July 2024, no. 466

I began Mandi Gray’s book while waiting for the judgment to be handed down in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson. I had tuned into the live-streamed trial months earlier, along with 124,444 others, to hear Brittany Higgins being interrogated about her recollections of that fateful night in Parliament House. Gray’s argument – that some men were using defamation law to inflict further abuse and punishment on their victims, to cow them into silence, to chill public discussion of sexual violence – seemed apt indeed.

‘I had no idea it was possible to be sued for making a formal report of sexual violence.’ Suing for Silence opens with this common assumption. Gray’s incredulity illustrates how recently the gendered implications of defamation law have become clear. Other areas of law – criminal law, family law, and property law – have long been subject to feminist critique, but defamation law has largely escaped scrutiny. Suddenly it has become central to understanding whose stories are told, and how.

Suing for Silence: Sexual violence and defamation law

Suing for Silence: Sexual violence and defamation law

by Mandi Gray

University of British Columbia Press, Can$32.95 pb, 174 pp

From the New Issue

You May Also Like