Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

The Update - February 28, 2017

by
ABR Arts 28 February 2017

The Update - February 28, 2017

by
ABR Arts 28 February 2017

An assault on the arts

The US National Endowment for the Arts was one of the great creations of the 1960s, when US presidents like John F. Kennedy valued the arts. Currently, after decades of cuts and opposition, its annual budget has been reduced to US$148 million, compared with the $183.4 million the Australia Council for the Arts receives. Now the NEA, like the National Endowment for the Humanities, is threatened with abolition. Thomas P. Campbell, director of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, had a strong op. ed. piece in The New York Times. He wrote: ‘I fear that this current call to abolish the NEA is the beginning of a new assault on artistic activity ... Eliminating the NEA would in essence eliminate investment by the American government in the curiosity and intelligence of its citizens.’ Read the full article on the New York Times website.

As one website comment asserts: ‘If the current regime has its way, the only artists that'll be actively supported by the government are con artists’.

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.