Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Untitled

by
December 2004–January 2005, no. 267

Untitled

by
December 2004–January 2005, no. 267

This year for the third year in a row, Black Inc. is reprinting writing from HEAT in one of its ‘Best Australian’ anthologies, without seeking my permission as the magazine’s editor and publisher. They can do this because there is a legal loophole in Australia’s literary culture – literary magazines in this country do not normally have contracts with their authors. It is conventional to ask magazine editors for their permission before reprinting work that has appeared in their pages; but the fact is, if the author’s permission can be won it is entirely irrelevant, from a legal point of view what the magazine editor thinks.

There are practical reasons why literary magazines do not normally place their authors under contract. With the limited resources available, the additional administrative burden of handling contracts with up to 100 authors a year is not a prospect an editor willingly entertains. But there is a more important reason why this part of the literary world has remained open and unregulated. The relationship between magazine editor and writer is one based on trust, loyalty and a commitment to shared intellectual or aesthetic ideals. It is not primarily a commercial relationship.

From the New Issue

You May Also Like

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.