Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

False and Pernicious Doctrine

by
June 1979, no. 11

This Sin and Scandal: Australia’s population debate 1891–1911 by Neville Hicks

ANU Press, $12.15, 208 pb

False and Pernicious Doctrine

by
June 1979, no. 11

Perhaps no other social attitude has changed so markedly in this century as the prevailing public reaction towards the question of the limitation of population growth and the use of birth control devices.

In my childhood, the large families of our working-class neighbourhood were subjected to the derision of smug and usually protestant parents of neat, small families who viewed such unrestrained childbearing as evidence of a feckless and undisciplined life style, devoid of proper moral restraint. This decade has seen the advocates of zero population growth and of women’s liberation add their voices to the cause of population control. Yet in the early years of this century such moral condemnation was reserved for those who advocated the use of birth control, in an intellectual climate which saw the prevention of conception as undermining the very basis of Christian marriage and which gloomily viewed a declining birth-rate as evidence of ‘racial decay’ and a threat to the survival of the Anglo-Saxon race on the Australian continent.

This Sin and Scandal: Australia’s population debate 1891–1911

This Sin and Scandal: Australia’s population debate 1891–1911

by Neville Hicks

ANU Press, $12.15, 208 pb

From the New Issue

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.