Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

A ‘Change Election’

The US presidential campaign
by
November 2008, no. 306

A ‘Change Election’

The US presidential campaign
by
November 2008, no. 306

It has been an extraordinary political war. Conventional wisdoms and long-standing assumptions have flown out the window. The final choice is remarkable: a young, ‘cool’ and detached African American who abjures commitment versus a decided, indeed hot-tempered, maverick whose entire essence is commitment. Long gone is the ‘inevitable candidate’ whose gender is now represented on the opposition ticket, as a vice-presidential candidate no one came close to predicting.

Along the way, the political process has been energised. Unlike the caucus system in Australia, which restricts the choice of leader to elected members of parliament, the American process has been, well, American: wide open, breezy and totally unpredictable. As against those 226 parliamentarians in Canberra who chose the leaders of all of Australia’s political parties, nearly sixty million Americans voted in the 2008 primary elections to choose their leaders, a greater engagement of the citizenry than in any previous presidential contest. And they chose unconventional outsiders – on both sides.

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.