Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Prime Movers: From Pericles to Gandhi: Twelve great political thinkers and what’s wrong with each of them by Ferdinand Mount

by
April 2019, no. 410

Prime Movers: From Pericles to Gandhi: Twelve great political thinkers and what’s wrong with each of them by Ferdinand Mount

Simon & Schuster, $59.99 hb, 438 pp, 9781471156007

Prime Movers: From Pericles to Gandhi: Twelve great political thinkers and what’s wrong with each of them by Ferdinand Mount

by
April 2019, no. 410

Describe the twelve most influential thinkers who shaped Western political traditions. Chaos must ensue. Your list will be outrageous, but mine also. Consider whom you leave off the roll-call. Just one woman. No one from Africa or Asia. Only Jesus to represent millennia of Jewish thought. Yet books of lists appeal to publishers. Controversy sells. To call a book Prime Movers with the subtitle From Pericles to Gandhi: Twelve great political thinkers and whats wrong with each of them just looks cynical.

This is unfortunate, for Prime Movers is often enjoyable and insightful. Ferdinand Mount, baronet, Etonian, former editor of the Times Literary Supplement, adviser to Margaret Thatcher, writes with clarity about ideas. His assessment of some big names in political thinking – Pericles, Jesus, Rousseau, Smith, Burke, Jefferson, Bentham, Wollstonecraft, Mazzini, Marx, Gandhi, and Iqbal – can be incisive. Thus Marx is praised in some detail for a perceptive reading of English industrialisation, but criticised at similar length for persisting with a labour theory of value. Jesus is not systematic, with no political program. He leaves a church to fill in the gaps, often with inhumane results. Thomas Jefferson proclaims universal principles but acts like the southern politician he was, failing to confront the original sin of American slavery. Mount has particular animus for Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who fails to think through the consequences of tearing up familiar institutions, and Jeremy Bentham for reducing human motivation to a simplistic formula and applying it to every aspect of society, from prisons to economies. Did the author have Margaret Thatcher in mind when mounting the cost?

From the New Issue

You May Also Like

Comment (1)

  • I am intrigued by Glyn Davis's comment: "No one from Africa or Asia." Given the book's title, Davis might have noticed that Gandhi definitely came from Asia and his philosophy was much shaped by experience in Africa. Davis's view is therefore rather "special", not in a good way, and this devalues the rest of his review. I am surprised that this slipped, without comment, past the editor.
    Posted by Graham Peters
    10 November 2019

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.