Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Sorry tales

A study of collective biopolitics
by
March 2024, no. 462

The Penitent State: Exposure, mourning, and the biopolitics of national healing by Paul Muldoon

Oxford University Press, 83 hb, 335 pp

Sorry tales

A study of collective biopolitics
by
March 2024, no. 462

The recent past is replete with instances of sovereign states doing penance for wrongdoing. The Berlin Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), and Kevin Rudd’s apology to the Stolen Generations are just three examples that receive extended analysis in Paul Muldoon’s The Penitent State. On Muldoon’s telling, the concept of ‘biopolitics’ is central to explaining why these ‘penitent states’ work so hard to press our physical and emotional buttons, not just our intellectual or cognitive ones. Through institutions of atonement, the state is trying to clear a perceived blockage in perpetrators’ collective emotional system. It is trying to make us cry.

The Penitent State: Exposure, mourning, and the biopolitics of national healing

The Penitent State: Exposure, mourning, and the biopolitics of national healing

by Paul Muldoon

Oxford University Press, 83 hb, 335 pp

From the New Issue

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.