Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Beyond the mundane

Popular science writing in our literary landscape
by
August 2024, no. 467

Beyond the mundane

Popular science writing in our literary landscape
by
August 2024, no. 467

After Netflix’s intriguing sci-fi thriller 3 Body Problem streamed into Australia earlier this year, readers rushed out in droves to buy the book on which the series is based: Liu Cixin’s The Three-Body Problem (2008), which was first translated into English in 2014. Most reviews have focused on the philosophical, literary, and cultural aspects of the book – and they are, indeed, fascinating. But the thing that interests me here is the accurate scientific detail that Liu uses to drive the story. Of course, this is sci-fi, so ultimately he presses real concepts into unreal (but imaginative) service. Still, much more physics and maths appear in his book than in the Netflix series, which, according to Tara Kenny’s review in The Monthly (April 2024), ‘offers a welcome workaround’ the science through visual effects. In the book, by contrast, ‘Lengthy passages are spent dutifully explaining physics theories and technological functionality, which is likely to deter readers who haven’t thought about science since they dissected a rat in high-school biology.’

Kenny’s assumption about the likely response of Australian readers to complex scientific ideas is telling – and probably fairly accurate overall, judging by the relatively low number (around ten per cent) of Year Twelve students undertaking advanced mathematics and physics courses. Perhaps this is why in-depth popular science writing is rarely rated as ‘literature’ by our literary gatekeepers. For instance, it rarely makes the shortlists of our non-fiction literary awards, now that the special science categories that existed a decade or two ago have disappeared. When it does, the emphasis is on the social and political consequences of science, rather than on its ideas. Still, ‘hard science fiction’ (a science-oriented subgenre of sci-fi) attracts quite a readership here, as does popular science. In fact, many passages in The Three-Body Problem read like popular physics, including, naturally, an explanation of the eponymous problem, in which the paths of three or more gravitationally interacting bodies can become chaotic, unlike the predictable orbital ellipses of a two-body system such as Earth and Sun.

Comments (2)

  • The clarity and currency of Bertrand Russell's writing on politics and society in the period between the wars are breathtaking. What is striking is his general avoidance of the goodies versus baddies form of analysis, which dominates so much of what passes for political commentary today.
    Posted by Patrick Hockey
    12 August 2024
  • Great article. The gatekeepers have always underestimated the breadth of Australian readers' interests, intellectual capacity, curiosity and willingness to delve into unfamiliar territory. I fear it is getting worse, with so much economic anxiety in publishing. (I imagine a group-think situation in which they ask each other if something is okay to like - as the space for the acceptable gets smaller and smaller)
    Posted by JM Green
    31 July 2024

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.