Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Orreries and Putti

by
September 2003, no. 254

The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science edited by J.L. Heilbron

OUP, $120 hb, 969 pp

Orreries and Putti

by
September 2003, no. 254

What should you expect from a companion? Resolute reliability? Occasional inspiration? Whimsical, even capricious distraction? I decided to start with my own pet subject, ethology, one that has a solid presence in the scientific discourse of the second half of the twentieth century, with contributions from Franz de Waal, Jane Goodall, Desmond Morris and Steven Rose, as well as from the three Nobel laureates recognised in 1973.

I lifted the hefty Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science and found no section headed ‘ethology’. So I went to the front of the book seeking the less technical ‘animal behaviour’. No luck there, either. So to the index. Nothing. What about under ‘psychology’? But there is no such heading! Can psychology be too recent a discipline to qualify? Or insufficiently scientific? Only behaviourism and phenomenology sneak into this category.

The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science

The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science

edited by J.L. Heilbron

OUP, $120 hb, 969 pp

From the New Issue

You May Also Like

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.