Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

‘We right to go?’

Heeding the lessons of the Covid-19 pandemic
by
October 2024, no. 469

Australia’s Pandemic Exceptionalism: How we crushed the curve but lost the race by Steven Hamilton and Richard Holden

UNSW Press, $39.99 pb, 234 pp

‘We right to go?’

Heeding the lessons of the Covid-19 pandemic
by
October 2024, no. 469

The Covid-19 pandemic has left its mark on all of us. How could it not? The shuttered small businesses; the warring states; the spectre of aged care residents, hands pressed against glass, unable to touch or receive relatives. The Centrelink queues, the taped-up playgrounds, the closed borders. The stranded cruise ships, the panic buying of toilet paper, the unrelenting and crushing boredom of our four walls. Personally, I can’t see a North Face jacket without a visceral flashback to our erstwhile Victorian premier and his trademark press conference opener: ‘We right to go?’ The desire to forget all of this, to move on from the pandemic, is what makes Australia’s Pandemic Exceptionalism: How we crushed the curve but lost the race such an important contribution to the literature of Covid-19 post-mortems.

Economists Steven Hamilton and Richard Holden were regular contributors to the op-ed pages during lockdowns, heartily supporting the fiscal response, and lambasting our costly dithering in vaccine procurement (an ‘unmitigated disaster’) and the sluggish roll-out of rapid antigen tests, or RATs (‘unconscionable’). They have synthesised their individual contributions into a shared argument: the Morrison government both succeeded and failed in its response to Covid-19, and there are vital lessons to be learnt.

Australia’s Pandemic Exceptionalism: How we crushed the curve but lost the race

Australia’s Pandemic Exceptionalism: How we crushed the curve but lost the race

by Steven Hamilton and Richard Holden

UNSW Press, $39.99 pb, 234 pp

Comment (1)

  • The larger undocumented story is the very large cohort in Victoria that were disenfranchised by the experience and remain bitter and simmering. A dangerous set of preconditions with which to face the next crisis.
    Posted by Patrick Hockey
    05 October 2024

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.